Mold-Help.org - The world's largest TOXIC MOLD website
  • Mold Basics
    • Mold Overview
    • Mold Symptoms
    • Mold Types & Images
    • Fungal Infections
  • Resources and Tools
    • Home Care
    • Health & Diet
    • Tips for Parents
    • Coping with Loss
    • Private Research
    • Legal Suggestions
    • Mold in the Bible
  • Mold News
    • Current Headlines
    • “Sick Buildings”
    • The Environment
    • Construction Industry
    • Govt. & Politics
    • The Workplace
    • Landlords & Tenants
    • Insurance Companies
    • Schools & Institutions
    • Strange Fungal Tales
    • Personal Mold Stories
    • Additional Articles
  • Agencies & Experts
  • About Mold-Help
    • Mold-Help News
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

After relentless research, further clarification explains why “toxic” mold is definitely more dangerous than “allergic” mold.

Who really created the “hype” and “hysteria” approach to this national health crisis?  Why they would downplay a nationwide epidemic and misrepresent the facts.

The Marketing Plan

There has been much confusion surrounding the media recently that demonstrates many people appear to be de-sensitized and confused to the hazardous facts regarding exposure to toxigenic molds.  Due to the recent media frenzy, and irresponsible reporting practices fueled by media sponsors, such as insurance and pharmaceutical companies.  A current survey we conducted shows that many still believe that exposure to toxic mold can cause slight allergic effects. the report also explains that many people believe that toxic mold and allergenic mold are one and the same; and some think that allergic mold (mold that just causes minor allergic reactions) is more  dangerous than toxic mold (mold that produces mycotoxins that can cause permenent neurological damage, among other hazardous consequences). This ignorance can be partially blamed by innovative marketing schemes that large corporations who have a vested interests from the ramifications of an educated public.

Case in point, Clorox, a well known chemical company that produces bleach and Tilex (a product that Clorox claims is a mold and mildew “remover”) recently funded a study on the health effects of allergenic molds.  The following paragraph is an excerpt of their “findings.”

“Although toxic mold has received much media attention lately, toxic reactions caused by fungal exposure have not been found to be a significant health problem,” claimed lead author Jay M. Portnoy, despite the numerous peer-reviewed medical papers that state the contrary.  “The more common household molds, when in the presence of moisture, can proliferate and cause problems and health effects that are generally due to allergy or irritation to fungal substances.” Portnoy went on to say, “An individual should not panic at the first sight of mold growing in their home.”  He also contends that small areas of visible mold growth should be cleaned with (but of course!) a dilute bleach/detergent solution, which kills viable colonies and removes fungal allergens. Commercial products are available for this purpose.” Although this came as no surprise since the study was funded by Clorox, this comment is extremely poor advice.  Using bleach on mold can actually exacerbate a potential mold problem as it sets off millions of poisonous mycotoxins and doesn’t actually kill mold. Besides, if mold is present, it is highly likely that it is also growing rampantly between walls or in unseen places.

This report is obvious to many researchers that realize that the government has been under fire since it was discovered that some federal funded papers have surfaced from some people in the insurance defense industry that failed to explain the neurological and pathological aspects of fungal exposure. The classic example of “propaganda reporting” are two other questionable and incomplete studies: The Institute Of Medicine’s,  “Damp Indoor Spaces and Health” dated May 25, 2004 (IOM report), and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine Position Paper released in 2002, (ACOEM report).

Some human rights groups have begun to call upon Congress and US Surgeon General Carmona to de-published these two review reports because of the fraud they are perpetrating on the American public. With all the known illnesses caused by mold exposure, the obvious intent of these two papers is nothing more than to limit and deny medical claims related to mold exposure. They are designed and were written for improper use in United States courtrooms. The ACOEM report (originally written by Globaltox) is based on a single study in mice and the IOM report myopically looked at non-infectious diseases caused by mold exposure, only.

The Manhattan Institute, a national political ‘think-tank,’ paid GlobalTox $40,000 to write a position paper regarding the potential health risks of toxic mold exposure. Contrary to unbiased medical research, the controversial piece claims that it is not plausible the types of illnesses experienced by the Haynes family and reported by thousands from across the US, could possibly be caused by “toxic mold”  exposure in homes, schools or office buildings.

The Paper Trail

In 2003, with the involvement of the US Chamber of Commerce and ex-developer, and monies raised by special interest groups by US Congressman Gary Miller (R-CA), a former land developer who has strong ties to the building industry, the GlobalTox report was disseminated to the real estate, mortgage and building industries’ associations. A version of the Manhattan Institute commissioned piece may also be found as a position statement on the website of a US medical policy-writing body, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Two principals of GlobalTox, Inc., Dr Kelman and  Retired Assistant Surgeon General, Bryan Hardin, acknowledged as co-authors of the ACOEM position statement. Dr. Andrew Saxon, M.D. Director UCLA Asthma, Allergy, and Immunologic Disease Center, who also frequently testifies as an expert witness against those who have been exposed to toxic mold, is the third listed author. Testimonies of Dr. Kelman and Dr. Saxon substantiating the above can be verified in the United States District Court in Arizona, Killian vs. Equity Residential Trust, et. Case No CIV02-1272-PHX-FJM also demonstrates that their company, GlobalTox, sold an altered version of that report for $40,000.00 to the Manhattan Institute.

This is strikingly similar to the conflict of interest by the FDA experts in approving Celebrex, Bextra and Vioxx, discussed in the New York Times, March 4, 2005 Editorial “Experts and the Drug Industry”.  In other words, states environmental health advocate Sharon Kramer, “This is blatantly the Fox Watching the Hen House.” “The ACOEM has another PhD, who does expert defense testimony, giving training seminars on mold exposure to physicians, Ronald Gots: ‘From Clinic to Courtroom’. Gots has already been investigated by Dateline in 2000 for questionable worker’s comp claim denials”.

Propaganda Reporting; Only Presenting One Side Equals Telling 1/2 the Truth

The latest propaganda report to come under fire was a recent article in Forbes Magazine which showcases Dr. Gary Ordog; a knowledgeable physician who treats patients who suffer from mycotoxicosis (mold poisoning) and the large sums he receives as an expert witness in plaintiff cases.  What the article failed to mention that the so called “Independent Medical Examiners” that the defense hires generally charge double to triple the cost of the ethical mold experts who testify for the plaintiffs.  When asked why, one such specialist who wishes to remain anonymous, stated, “It is more expensive to lie than to tell the truth.”  The Forbes article also didn’t explain that because insurance companies, builders, and other defendants often have several resources to protect themselves against litigation when the average homeowner, who loses their health, belongings and home to mold, often has no alternative but to sue.  Aside from paying for additional living quarters, mounting medical bills, buying new belongings, and paying legal expenses, few are able to thrive without going bankrupt as their cases are often appealed several times.  If a mold victim and family does receive compensation, it never makes up for their losses, health problems, mental anguish, and the precious time that was lost during their illness and recovery.  Additionally, depending on the molds they were exposed to, most will live with the fear of being pre-disposed to asthma and suffer from altered immunity for the rest of their lives.

Why?

If the government were to admit that exposure to toxigenic mold can cause permanent neurological, immunological, pathological and psychological damage to humans and animals this country could virtually go bankrupt.  Try to picture all of the people that would liable for low-income housing, government buildings, prisoners, military  and government workers, and all of the patients who have been misdiagnosed due to fungal exposure from our physicians that were educated by the pharmaceutical industry, the building industry, the insurance, and lastly, the pharmaceutical industry which makes billions and billions of dollars each year for their products designed to treat the symptoms of many fungal related illnesses.  When you consider all of the implications  of such knowledge then think about the economic loss from the litigation and liability aspect.

It can’t help but make you wonder if you had to make the decision.  This is truly why the United States Government and its political allies will never admit the truth.  This is why all of the propaganda reporting is starting to become more prevalent.  The fear lies in the truth; and the truth is getting much closer.

Carolyn Willbanks
Author: Carolyn Willbanks

Resources & Tools

  • Private Research
  • Coping with Loss
  • Spiritual Definition
  • Legal Suggestions
  • Home Care
  • Tips for Parents
  • Health & Diet

Latest Posts

  • Michigan Family Finds Toxic Mold Inside Home
  • California Winter Storms: Water Damage and Mold Exposure Concerns in California
  • Office and Commercial Buildings at Risk for Mold after COVID-19 Closings
  • COVID-19 Symptoms May Include Loss of Taste and Smell
  • New Mold Detox Information on the Horizon
  • COVID-19 Courses of Action
  • Stachybotrys
  • Simple and Easy Ways to Prevent the Coronavirus
  • Your Air Conditioning Unit Helps Eliminate Mold
  • Construction Workers Are Learning to Control Dust and Debris

Search Our Site:

Need Help with Mold?

Are you being affected by mold or other mycotoxins in your environment? Our team and community has over 15 years experience and can provide guidance. You can reach us by submitting your contact or through our Facebook page.

Have a Story to Share?

We're looking for stories and input to expand our database and to add to the personal experiences we've received from the thousands of victims over the last 15. If mold has impacted your life, please take the time to share your story. Your information is confidential and will only be shared with your permission.

Seeking Mold Experts

Are you an expert in the treatment of mold-affected health illnesses, or a provider of services to victims of mycotoxin exposure? Submit your information for listing consideration in our Agencies & Experts resource database.

Additional Resources

  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Glossary of Terms
  • Survivor Resources
  • General Inquiries
  • Legal Disclaimer

© Copyright - Mold-Help Organization
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Mold Basics
  • Resources and Tools
  • Agencies & Experts
  • Mold News
  • About Mold-Help
Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

OKLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Accept settingsHide notification only